Advertisement 1

Will the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion wipe out B.C.s killer whales? Definitely not

There are only about 78 Southern Resident Killer Whales left in the world, but as Andrew Roman explains for Junk Science Week there are many factors that affect their survival

Article content

Opponents of Kinder Morgan’s Trans Mountain Pipeline expansion claim that the increased tanker traffic in the waters frequented by a subspecies of killer whale will cause their extinction. Killer whales, also called orcas, are an iconic species of marine mammals much beloved by Canadians. The subspecies, the Southern Resident Killer Whales (SRKW) was listed as endangered under Canada’s Species at Risk Act in 2003.

Advertisement 2
Story continues below
Article content

By 2016, only 78 SRKW remained. Their known range extends from northern British Columbia to central California. During the summer months they concentrate off the southern end of Vancouver Island and are most frequently sighted in Haro Strait, Georgia Strait, and the Strait of Juan de Fuca.

The Lead Now activist group says the whales will be “wiped out” by the new tanker traffic in the waters frequented by the SRKW. In an article on the website of the Tsleil-Waututh First Nation titled “Choose Orcas — Not the Kinder Morgan Pipeline,” the band claims that “the noise pollution alone is enough to make the song of the southern resident killer whales go silent by wiping out this endangered species.”

Article content

But this is a false and unnecessary choice between pipelines and whales. To consider the real choices we need to examine why these orcas are endangered.

The three causes generally cited for the decreasing SRKW population are:

– Starvation: fishing of Chinook salmon has reduced their primary food source, requiring them to travel further for less food.

– Contamination: pesticides (such as PCBs) concentrate in their bodies because orcas are at the apex of the predatory food chain.

Article content
Advertisement 3
Story continues below
Article content

– Underwater noise: ship propellers and engines noise can interfere with their echolocation of prey.

The inadequate efforts to ensure the whales’ survival that have been tried to date are well described in a recent article published by the World Wildlife Federation. While Ottawa recently announced new funding to protect whales, the orcas off the B.C. coast “are slowly starving to death. Funding for technology and research is important, but a cash infusion alone won’t feed the 76 orcas facing extinction today.”

Nor will stopping tanker traffic.

The new Kinder Morgan pipeline will bring a sevenfold increase in tanker traffic. That sounds like a lot, until we look at it in context. There are currently approximately 20 large ships per day associated with Vancouver, transiting Haro Strait, the core of the summertime habitat of the SRKWs.

The Trans Mountain pipeline will add approximately one tanker per day, which would be a five-per-cent increase in traffic. However, there will be larger increases in traffic by other vessels that are noisier than tankers. The Vancouver Fraser Port Authority 2017 Annual Report estimates that its cargo traffic will increase by an average of 3.7 per cent per year between 2018 and 2022, from 142 to 171 million tonnes, an increase of approximately 20 per cent over the four years.

Advertisement 4
Story continues below
Article content

Interestingly, no one is suggesting we must choose between orcas and cargo ships

Obviously, this will create a much greater noise effect than one additional tanker per day would. Interestingly, no one is suggesting that we must choose between orcas and more cargo ships, nor are there calls to stop the growth of cargo ships traveling to the Port of Vancouver. Yet, noise is noise, regardless of which shipping company creates it. No one explains why a modest increase in noise from tankers is unacceptable while a larger increase of noise from other ships doesn’t matter.

In fact, detailed studies of noise levels of different ships show that the loudest noise is created by the large container ships and vehicle carriers, which are noisier than tankers. Why the obsession with noise from tankers rather than greater noise from container ships?

Nor do pipeline opponents seem nearly as bothered about the very direct disturbance caused to the orcas by whale-watching tours. In its “Review of the Effectiveness of Recovery Measures for Southern Resident Killer Whales,” the federal Fisheries Department reports that “Positive steps taken to reducing threats to SRKWs include the development of whale watching guidelines in Canada and enforcement of whale watching regulations in the U.S.” The U.S. has already imposed legally binding regulations requiring a minimum distance for whale-watching ships to stay away from the orcas, but Canada has only a suggested guideline.

Advertisement 5
Story continues below
Article content

In the Vancouver area the SRKW are frequently surrounded and followed for hours by whale-watching vessels, usually several at a time. But since this industry is characterized as ecotourism, all those motors must be desirable noise, while one oil tanker a day — maybe one several kilometers away from the whales — is said to be the sole cause of their extinction.

Lance Barrett-Lennard, a distinguished Vancouver marine scientist, argues there are several short-term measures available to increase the whales’ access to salmon, including restrictions on fishing of Chinook salmon and whale watching in key whale-foraging sites. He also proposed an increase in the minimum approach distances for whale-watching boats, a reduction in the number of boats approaching the whales at any given time and licensing of a reduced number of commercial whale-watching vessels.

Barrett-Lennard, who served on the panel that drafted the Resident Killer Whale Recovery Action Plan, does not suggest singling out oil tankers as the sole problem with noise or banning the construction of the Kinder Morgan pipeline as the only way to save the orcas.

If there are environmental reasons to oppose the construction of the Kinder Morgan pipeline, the marginal increase it would create in underwater noise from tankers is not one of them.

Andrew Roman practiced law, including numerous environmental cases across Canada, for more than four decades. He retired at the end of 2017.

Article content
Comments
You must be logged in to join the discussion or read more comments.
Join the Conversation

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion. Please keep comments relevant and respectful. Comments may take up to an hour to appear on the site. You will receive an email if there is a reply to your comment, an update to a thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information.

This Week in Flyers