Taiwanese bakery and beverage shop 85°C landed itself in hot water after declaring on Wednesday that it supports the so-called “1992 consensus,” and that Taiwan and China are “one family.”
The assertion that the two nations are one family has been a source of great controversy since Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) said it at the twin-city forum between Taipei and Shanghai on Aug. 18, 2015.
Other politicians, including former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairwoman Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱), have made similar statements and in December last year, a cross-strait baseball tournament held in Shenzhen, China, came under fire from the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) for flying a banner proclaiming a cross-strait “family.”
Calling China and Taiwan a family is understandably offensive to Taiwanese who do not wish to be associated with China — a nation that incessantly blocks Taiwan’s attempts to participate in the global arena. However, the statement essentially means little except for placing companies in the position of alienating those who identify as Taiwanese — as opposed to Chinese — in exchange for access to the Chinese market.
Ko on Sunday last week said that his idea of a “cross-strait family” does not pertain to politics, but rather to economic and cultural exchanges. By this logic, all nations that share close economic ties might call each other “family,” and some do.
Former US ambassador to Canada Bruce Heyman wrote in a June 1 piece for the Guardian that “We [the US and Canada] are family. Millions of Americans and Canadians are related to each other by blood or marriage. Thousands cross the border every day — visiting relatives, doing business, celebrating holidays.”
The difference is that Heyman had nothing to gain by making this statement and was not coerced by Ottawa into professing it. Rather, he was making the statement to criticize his own president — US President Donald Trump — for hitting long-term ally Canada with tariffs.
Unlike economic arguments, which are easily quantified, defining family on cultural terms is problematic, because culture itself cannot be objectively defined. The Oxford dictionary defines culture as the “ideas, customs, attitudes and social behavior of a particular people or society.”
However, no one would argue that all people in a society share the same attitudes and ideas on all issues. Customs cross national borders — such as how Christmas is celebrated across the world, or how weddings are held in churches in many nations.
Even in a nation such as China, by no definition of “culture” are the people in all its regions culturally the same. An old Chinese proverb says of China: “Praxes vary within 10 li [5km], customs vary within 100 li” (十里不同風, 百里不同俗). Anyone who has traveled throughout China knows this very well.
That is not to say that one cannot come to certain conclusions or generalizations about a nation as a whole, but these are subjective observations.
Hong Kong writer Lo Wing-hong (羅永康) was quoted in an editorial on Jan. 24 last year as saying: “While Chinese treat everyone like a thief, Taiwanese try to provide a sense of security which allows people to be free from fear. Believing that people are inherently good, Taiwanese are not always suspicious of others ... the idea that the two places are culturally similar is absurd.”
Lo’s observations demonstrate that people might have different subjective experiences in China and Taiwan, based on some definition of “culture.”
In democratic Taiwan, a company or individual should be free to irrationally define China and Taiwan as “one family,” but they should also prepare to be criticized by a citizenry who disagrees with them.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs