Advertisement 1

Accused in Kirkland shooting to undergo further psychiatric evaluation

D.D.O. man is charged with trying to kill his two sons, one of whom was shot along with his grandfather who reportedly tried to protect him.

Article content

A West Island man who was charged after his five-year-old son and father-in-law were shot in a Kirkland home last Friday has been ordered detained at the Philippe-Pinel Institute where he is to undergo a psychiatric evaluation.

Quebec Court Judge Marie-Josée Di Lallo issued the order Monday as the 36-year-old Dollard-des-Ormeaux resident made a brief appearance at the Montreal courthouse.

Advertisement 2
Story continues below
Article content

The man, who has two sons, is accused of trying to kill both. He faces six charges in all: two counts of attempted murder, two counts of using a firearm to commit a crime, and two counts of aggravated assault — one on his father-in-law.

Article content

The name of the accused cannot be published because of a court order intended to protect the identity of the boys.

Prosecutor Alexandre Arel requested the psychiatric evaluation following a mental health evaluation at the Rivière-des-Prairies Detention Centre during the weekend.

Arel told the judge the more thorough evaluation is necessary to determine whether the man was suffering from a mental illness at the time of the shootings and whether he could be found criminally responsible if the case goes to trial.

The Montreal police were called to the Kirkland home and found that one of the boys and his grandfather had been shot. Both were conscious and able to talk to emergency responders before they were taken to a hospital.

According to the charge sheet, the accused does not reside at the address where the shots were fired.

The father-in-law was reportedly shot while trying to protect one of his grandsons.

Defence lawyer Richard Shadley told Di Lallo that he “totally agrees” with Arel’s request for the evaluation.

Outside the courtroom, the defence attorney told reporters that his client “regrets what happened.”

“We are not in any way trying to minimize what has happened,” Shadley said. “My client is honestly upset with what happened.”

The case returns to court on Dec. 11.

pcherry@postmedia.com

Article content
Comments
You must be logged in to join the discussion or read more comments.
Join the Conversation

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion. Please keep comments relevant and respectful. Comments may take up to an hour to appear on the site. You will receive an email if there is a reply to your comment, an update to a thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information.

This Week in Flyers