Britain | Fielding criticism

Should cricket be free to air on British television?

Or is it just a silly point?

Risen from the Ashes

HERE’S THE pitch: why not make cricket, that most English of sports, free to air on national television? That is what Jeremy Corbyn, leader of the opposition, committed socialist and noted cricket nut, suggested on Twitter a few minutes after England won the World Cup on July 14th. The final, watched by up to 8m people, was the first England international match to be aired on free television since the Ashes in 2005, after which the sport moved to pay-TV and a far smaller audience. Making it free again could help to boost the popularity of the game, which many consider elitist or dull, the argument goes. And it would be a popular expression of Mr Corbyn’s slogan, “For the many, not the few.”

Since the 1950s the government has had the power to ensure that big sports events are free to watch. The Broadcasting Act of 1996 designates certain events that qualify, including the Olympic games, Wimbledon and the finals of the football World Cup and FA Cup. A review of the list in 2009 would have removed some events and added lots more, including home cricket matches. But its recommendations were batted away by the Conservative-Lib Dem government in 2010.

This article appeared in the Britain section of the print edition under the headline "Fielding criticism"

The next 50 years in space

From the July 20th 2019 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Britain

Why Britain’s membership of the ECHR has become a political issue

And why leaving would be a mistake

The ECtHR’s Swiss climate ruling: overreach or appropriate?

A ruling on behalf of pensioners does not mean the court has gone rogue


Why are so many bodies in Britain found in a decomposed state?

To understand Britons’ social isolation, consider their corpses