Britain’s biggest fraud trial pits Mike Lynch against Hewlett Packard
The trial is going well for “Britain’s Bill Gates”, but extradition to America looms
LONDON’S LEGAL district, dotted with purveyors of horsehair wigs and pubs once frequented by Charles Dickens, seems an unlikely setting for an entrepreneur at the cutting edge of technology. Mike Lynch, sometimes called Britain’s Bill Gates, backed Darktrace, an artificial-intelligence-powered cyber-security firm that has become one of the country’s most highly valued startups. But Mr Lynch will not be celebrating. Instead he is spending summer in court fighting Hewlett-Packard (HP), an American IT giant, over alleged fraud at Autonomy, another firm he founded and which HP bought in 2011.
It is Britain’s biggest-ever fraud case. HP’s claim of $5.1bn against Mr Lynch is massive chiefly because the American firm overpaid for Autonomy. A decade ago, after a series of boardroom crises, HP was keen to add high-margin software to its lacklustre hardware business. It paid $10.3bn for Autonomy, which reported revenues of $870m in 2010, representing a whopping 64% premium to its market value.
This article appeared in the Britain section of the print edition under the headline "Lynch mob"
Britain July 20th 2019
- Wobbles in Britain’s housing market may augur something worse
- St Ives’s second-home crackdown has unintended consequences
- The Brecon by-election is a test for Britain’s next prime minister
- How phonics took over English schools
- Scotland overtakes America as the world’s drug-overdose capital
- Britain’s biggest fraud trial pits Mike Lynch against Hewlett Packard
- Should cricket be free to air on British television?
- The study of history is in decline in Britain
More from Britain
Why so many Britons have taken to stand-up paddleboarding
It combines fitness, wellness and smugness
Why Britain’s membership of the ECHR has become a political issue
And why leaving would be a mistake
The ECtHR’s Swiss climate ruling: overreach or appropriate?
A ruling on behalf of pensioners does not mean the court has gone rogue