The end of the year is a time for closure and new beginnings. As this year winds down, that is certainly the case with Brexit. Following the victory of British Prime Minister Boris Johnson and the Conservative Party in the general election this month, it is now clear that the UK is to leave the EU on Jan. 31.
For many, the occasion would be tinged with regret, but it also represents an opportunity to forge a new UK-EU partnership. Besides, things could have been much worse. Owing to the withdrawal agreement that was concluded in October, a destructive “hard” Brexit has been averted.
Since the beginning of the Brexit negotiations, the EU side — the 27 member states and the European Parliament — has not strayed from the bloc’s core interests nor lost sight of the need for unity and solidarity. The EU’s priority was first and foremost to secure the rights of European citizens, including by finding a solution for the people of Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland, for whom the negotiations were about peace and stability, not just trade and the economy.
Illustration: Mountain People
Throughout the process, it has protected the EU single market and its guarantees for consumers, public and animal health standards, and safeguards against fraud and trafficking. It also did the utmost to preserve a climate of trust between the EU and the UK, and to lay a solid foundation for a new partnership.
In accordance with its own wishes, the UK would no longer participate in EU institutions as of Feb. 1, but it would remain in the single market and the customs union at least until the end of next year. The free movement of people between the EU and the UK would continue, which means that it would be business as usual for citizens, consumers, businesses, students and researchers on both sides of the channel over the next year.
Moreover, with the transition period, there would be time to implement practical measures to guarantee EU and UK citizens’ rights, establish the customs and border arrangements agreed in Northern Ireland, and start to negotiate an agreement on the future relationship. However, in the absence of a decision by the UK before July to extend the transition period — which Johnson has ruled out — a deal on the future relationship would have to be concluded in less than 11 months.
That would be immensely challenging, but the EU will give it its all, even if it would not be able to achieve everything. Never would it be the EU that fails on common ambition.
RESOLUTIONS
Since it is the time for new year’s resolutions, negotiators should set three goals to achieve by this time next year. First, the EU and the UK must ensure that they have the means to work together and discuss joint solutions to global challenges. The UK might be leaving the EU, but it is not leaving Europe.
As European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen recently put it: “Whatever the future holds, the bond and the friendship between our people are unbreakable.”
From addressing climate change and promoting effective multilateralism, to defending their homelands and countering those who choose violence over peaceful solutions, the EU and UK share essential interests and values. That is why the EU would continue to engage positively with the UK, both bilaterally and in global forums such as the UN, the WTO and the G20.
Consider climate change. Next year, the UN Climate Change Conference (COP26) is to take place in Glasgow, Scotland. Setting ambitious targets would require a strong common position. If the EU and the UK cannot align on such a critical issue, there is little hope that others around the world would be able to do so.
COOPERATION
Second, the UK and the EU need to build a close security relationship. Here, too, the UK’s departure from the EU has consequences. The strong security cooperation that EU member states have put in place is linked to the free movement of people.
It works because there are common rules, common supervision mechanisms and a common European Court of Justice. Because EU countries trust each other and are assured that their fundamental rights are protected, they are able to share data extensively and implement integrated solutions.
The same degree of cooperation is simply not possible with a third country that is outside of the Schengen area. Neither the EU nor the UK can guarantee its security without looking beyond its borders and building alliances. Tackling terrorism, cyberattacks and other attempts to undermine democracies would require a joint effort.
The lives of EU citizens depend on the ability to count on each other. That is why there can be no trade-off on our mutual security. This should be an unconditional commitment from both sides. EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Josep Borrell agrees.
Third, by this time next year, there needs to be an economic partnership that reflects common interests, geographical proximity and interdependence. In the “political declaration” agreed in October alongside the withdrawal agreement, the UK government made clear that it would pursue a free-trade agreement with the EU, and rejected the idea that it would remain in the EU customs union. That means the UK and the EU would become two separate markets.
The EU — including European Commissioner for Trade Phil Hogan — would engage in these negotiations in a positive spirit, with the willingness to make the most of the short time available. However, like the UK, the EU would keep its strategic interests in mind.
It knows that competing on social and environmental standards — rather than on skills, innovation and quality — leads only to a race to the bottom that puts workers, consumers and the planet on the losing side. Thus, any free-trade agreement must provide for a level playing field on standards, state aid and tax matters.
These are the EU’s three goals for next year: to maintain a capacity to cooperate closely at the global level; to forge a strong security partnership; and to negotiate a new economic agreement (which, most likely, would have to be expanded in the years to come). If these three objectives are achieved, the negotiators would have made the most of the next year.
As soon as they receive their mandate from the 27 EU member states, the EU team would be ready to negotiate in a constructive spirit with the UK — a country that the EU would always regard as a friend, ally and partner.
Michel Barnier is a former vice president of the European Commission and French minister of foreign affairs. He is EU chief negotiator for the UK exiting the EU.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs