The end of the year is a time for closure and new beginnings. As this year winds down, that is certainly the case with Brexit. Following the victory of British Prime Minister Boris Johnson and the Conservative Party in the general election this month, it is now clear that the UK is to leave the EU on Jan. 31.
For many, the occasion would be tinged with regret, but it also represents an opportunity to forge a new UK-EU partnership. Besides, things could have been much worse. Owing to the withdrawal agreement that was concluded in October, a destructive “hard” Brexit has been averted.
Since the beginning of the Brexit negotiations, the EU side — the 27 member states and the European Parliament — has not strayed from the bloc’s core interests nor lost sight of the need for unity and solidarity. The EU’s priority was first and foremost to secure the rights of European citizens, including by finding a solution for the people of Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland, for whom the negotiations were about peace and stability, not just trade and the economy.
Illustration: Mountain People
Throughout the process, it has protected the EU single market and its guarantees for consumers, public and animal health standards, and safeguards against fraud and trafficking. It also did the utmost to preserve a climate of trust between the EU and the UK, and to lay a solid foundation for a new partnership.
In accordance with its own wishes, the UK would no longer participate in EU institutions as of Feb. 1, but it would remain in the single market and the customs union at least until the end of next year. The free movement of people between the EU and the UK would continue, which means that it would be business as usual for citizens, consumers, businesses, students and researchers on both sides of the channel over the next year.
Moreover, with the transition period, there would be time to implement practical measures to guarantee EU and UK citizens’ rights, establish the customs and border arrangements agreed in Northern Ireland, and start to negotiate an agreement on the future relationship. However, in the absence of a decision by the UK before July to extend the transition period — which Johnson has ruled out — a deal on the future relationship would have to be concluded in less than 11 months.
That would be immensely challenging, but the EU will give it its all, even if it would not be able to achieve everything. Never would it be the EU that fails on common ambition.
RESOLUTIONS
Since it is the time for new year’s resolutions, negotiators should set three goals to achieve by this time next year. First, the EU and the UK must ensure that they have the means to work together and discuss joint solutions to global challenges. The UK might be leaving the EU, but it is not leaving Europe.
As European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen recently put it: “Whatever the future holds, the bond and the friendship between our people are unbreakable.”
From addressing climate change and promoting effective multilateralism, to defending their homelands and countering those who choose violence over peaceful solutions, the EU and UK share essential interests and values. That is why the EU would continue to engage positively with the UK, both bilaterally and in global forums such as the UN, the WTO and the G20.
Consider climate change. Next year, the UN Climate Change Conference (COP26) is to take place in Glasgow, Scotland. Setting ambitious targets would require a strong common position. If the EU and the UK cannot align on such a critical issue, there is little hope that others around the world would be able to do so.
COOPERATION
Second, the UK and the EU need to build a close security relationship. Here, too, the UK’s departure from the EU has consequences. The strong security cooperation that EU member states have put in place is linked to the free movement of people.
It works because there are common rules, common supervision mechanisms and a common European Court of Justice. Because EU countries trust each other and are assured that their fundamental rights are protected, they are able to share data extensively and implement integrated solutions.
The same degree of cooperation is simply not possible with a third country that is outside of the Schengen area. Neither the EU nor the UK can guarantee its security without looking beyond its borders and building alliances. Tackling terrorism, cyberattacks and other attempts to undermine democracies would require a joint effort.
The lives of EU citizens depend on the ability to count on each other. That is why there can be no trade-off on our mutual security. This should be an unconditional commitment from both sides. EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Josep Borrell agrees.
Third, by this time next year, there needs to be an economic partnership that reflects common interests, geographical proximity and interdependence. In the “political declaration” agreed in October alongside the withdrawal agreement, the UK government made clear that it would pursue a free-trade agreement with the EU, and rejected the idea that it would remain in the EU customs union. That means the UK and the EU would become two separate markets.
The EU — including European Commissioner for Trade Phil Hogan — would engage in these negotiations in a positive spirit, with the willingness to make the most of the short time available. However, like the UK, the EU would keep its strategic interests in mind.
It knows that competing on social and environmental standards — rather than on skills, innovation and quality — leads only to a race to the bottom that puts workers, consumers and the planet on the losing side. Thus, any free-trade agreement must provide for a level playing field on standards, state aid and tax matters.
These are the EU’s three goals for next year: to maintain a capacity to cooperate closely at the global level; to forge a strong security partnership; and to negotiate a new economic agreement (which, most likely, would have to be expanded in the years to come). If these three objectives are achieved, the negotiators would have made the most of the next year.
As soon as they receive their mandate from the 27 EU member states, the EU team would be ready to negotiate in a constructive spirit with the UK — a country that the EU would always regard as a friend, ally and partner.
Michel Barnier is a former vice president of the European Commission and French minister of foreign affairs. He is EU chief negotiator for the UK exiting the EU.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under