Get 40% Off
⚠ Earnings Alert! Which stocks are poised to surge?
See the stocks on our ProPicks radar. These strategies gained 19.7% year-to-date.
Unlock full list

Biden blasts Trump's plan to push for Supreme Court nominee before election

Published 09/20/2020, 08:50 AM
Updated 09/20/2020, 09:17 PM
© Reuters. Democratic U.S. presidential nominee Joe Biden speaks about the death of U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in New Castle, Delaware

By Trevor Hunnicutt and Susan Heavey

PHILADELPHIA/WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden urged Senate Republicans not to vote on any candidate nominated to the U.S. Supreme Court as the November election nears, calling President Donald Trump's plan an "exercise of raw political power."

Biden was speaking on Sunday, the day a second Senate Republican voiced objections to Trump's plan for a quick vote on a replacement to liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who died on Friday. Such an appointment by the president, if approved by the Senate, would cement a 6-3 conservative majority that could influence American law and life for decades.

"Voters of this country should be heard ... they're the ones who this Constitution envisions should decide who has the power to make this appointment," Biden, who leads Trump in national opinion polls, said in Philadelphia. "To jam this nomination through the Senate is just an exercise of raw political power."

Biden said that if he wins the Nov. 3 election, he should have the chance to nominate the next Supreme Court justice.

The former vice president rejected the idea of releasing the names of potential nominees, saying that doing so, as Trump did, could improperly influence those candidates' decisions in their current court roles as well as subject them to "unrelenting political attacks."

He reiterated his pledge to nominate an African-American woman to the court, which would be a historic first, if he has the opportunity.

Earlier on Sunday, Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska said she did not support Trump's plan to move fast on filling the seat, becoming the second of the 53 Republicans in the 100-seat chamber to object publicly following Ginsburg's death.

On Saturday, Republican Senator Susan Collins of Maine said the presidential election winner should pick the nominee. She is locked in a tight re-election battle, while Murkowski's current term extends two more years.

Senator Lamar Alexander, another moderate Republican, said in a statement he did not object to a vote, adding: "No one should be surprised that a Republican Senate majority would vote on a Republican president’s Supreme Court nomination, even during a presidential election year."

Democrats noted that in 2016 Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell blocked a vote on a Democratic appointee on the grounds that the vacancy should be filled by the next president.

Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer did not rule out that his party might move in future to end the filibuster, a procedural tactic under which the support of 60 members is required to move to a vote on legislation, if the Republicans went ahead with the nomination.

"We first have to win the majority. ... But if we win the majority, everything is on the table," he said.

Schumer and U.S. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York told a joint news conference that putting another conservative on the court would put at risk healthcare and women's and LGBTQ rights.

A majority of Americans, some 62% including many Republicans, told a Reuters/Ipsos poll that they thought the winner of the November election should get to nominate a justice to fill the vacancy.

JOLT TO THE CAMPAIGN

Justice Antonin Scalia, a close friend of Ginsburg's, died in February 2016, but McConnell blocked a vote on Democratic President Barack Obama's Supreme Court nominee, Merrick Garland.

Trump said on Saturday he would make his nomination this week and named Amy Coney Barrett of the Chicago-based 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and Barbara Lagoa of the Atlanta-based 11th Circuit as possible candidates to fill the vacancy created by Ginsburg, a revered figure among liberals.

Ginsburg's death upended the November election campaign, energizing both Trump's conservative base - eager to see the court overturn the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision that legalized abortion nationwide - and presenting new complications in the battle for control of the U.S. Senate.

"I will be putting forth a nominee next week. It will be a woman," Trump said at a campaign rally in Fayetteville, North Carolina, where supporters chanted: "Fill that seat."

Trump and McConnell have time to make the nomination and schedule a vote. While elections are on Nov. 3, a new Congress will not be sworn in until Jan. 3, with the winner of the presidential contest inaugurated on Jan. 20.

Republican Senator John Barrasso on NBC's "Meet the Press" on Sunday brushed off Democratic complaints.

"Let's be very clear - if the shoe were on the other foot and the Democrats had the White House and the Senate, they would right now be trying to confirm another member of the Supreme Court," Barrasso said.

Democrat Hillary Clinton, whom Trump defeated in the 2016 election, on the same program called that view "indefensible."

"What's happening in our country is incredibly dangerous," said Clinton, a former secretary of state whose husband, Bill Clinton, nominated Ginsburg to the court in 1993. "Our institutions are being basically undermined by the lust for power."

Trump has already appointed two justices: Neil Gorsuch in 2017 and Brett Kavanaugh in 2018. Kavanaugh was narrowly confirmed after a heated confirmation process in which he angrily denied accusations by a California university professor, Christine Blasey Ford, that he had sexually assaulted her in 1982 when the two were high school students in Maryland.

© Reuters. Democratic U.S. presidential nominee Biden delivers remarks in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Latest comments

Show us where that never happened
Biden is incapable of counting to 12 or knowing where he is at this point. Dems want heels up as president i guess? Bad idea
Obummer didn't have the Senate during his last year. If he did, he would have seated his pick. This game is not all that complicated, and yet the socialist fascist anarchist dems just can't seem to figure it out. So sad..
Silence Dogood, make up your mind. Socialist? Or Fascist? (But please educate yourself on the proper meaning of those words, first). By definition, one can't be both at the same time.
Biden doesn't know the Supreme court from the food court at this moment. You are basically quoting a 23 yr old press assistant who got it from Rachel Boycut. Too bad Dems, you have no case
The hypocrisy of both parties. Like Cotton, Lindsey Graham an Biden what they say in the past came back to *****their ****** Now they all try to change their tune. Same ****does not matter which party just different color. God bless America. What a mess and the drama continues
Incomprehensible
Biden, you too old and greedy. Stop politics and stay home not to ruin this country like CCP China.
You too old? You sound like Tonto.....OK, Kemosabe!
Biden is trash
Why wouldnt Trump nominate someone? Its his duty and we expect it.
Yes the president should nominate someone... just like obama did
A neck would have been more professional on the subject of RBG replacement
90+ comments, who cares.
honestly, what did you think was going to happen?
Hopefully the Democrat party will regain what it once was. As of now, its the Communist/ Socialist/Marxist party. If the Democrats want any chance to win the 2024 election, its leaders will need to root out the evil that has destroyed the party.
Reuters bots!!!! All foreigners trying to meddle in America!
you foreigners will never live in a country as great as America!
The North should've eliminated the southern confederates after they and President Lincoln beat them and free'd the slaves.
Maybe its time to turn the page
The last thing this country needs is another bible thumping 'judge' stomping on the people liberty.
Literally does not matter who the president is. Why do people get so wrapped up in this
what do you mean does not matter? ex-presidents choose?  lol
dementia Joe.
Joe Biden claimed in 2016 that it was the 'constitutional duty' of a president to name a Supreme Court nominee even in an election year. Hypocrisy by Biden and Reuters for not mentioning that. SMH
link or didn't happen xd
https://www.usnews.com/news/elections/articles/2020-09-18/bidens-2016-arguments-support-republican-vote-on-new-supreme-court-justicehttps://www.newsweek.com/biden-2016-president-has-constitutional-duty-nominate-supreme-court-justice-even-months-1533106Here are two links. There are a lot more.
Yes he did, and he was correct at that time.  Harry Reed broke every former Senate tradition by the way, and the GOP now has the ball.
When there’s a Supreme Court vacancy, the President selects a nominee ...end of story. Who is Biden to call the rules! 47 year do nothing free loader , advising on going against the Constitution law! Is this a joke?
He's only asking for the same treatment for Rump that the Republican Senate forced on Obama. In 2016, Moscow Mitch, Lindsay Graham, and Ted Cruz (among others) disagreed with you and insisted that an election year should be an exception.
NOW!
"FIll that Seat!"
Sniffy doesn't know what time zone he's in.
No one in their right mind is voting for the Harris administration. Who the h.e-c.k is Harris anyway...? The only thing worth thinking about at this point is Pence/McEnany 2024. Don't mind the paid dem minions in these forums.
LOL, as if dombfocs democrats wouldn't do the same thing... HYPOCRITE
“When there’s a Supreme Court vacancy, the President selects a nominee and the Senate provides advice and consent. That’s what the Constitution says and those are the only rules,” Tim Murtaugh, Trump 2020 communications director, said in a statement.
Except those are not the rules that Moscow Mitch and the Senate Republicans went with in 2016. Now that following the usual rules is in their favor, suddenly they're all for it. How convenient.
do you forget what the messiah Obama did?
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.