Assembly ruckus | High Court refuses to stay summons issued to Jayarajan and Jaleel

The Ministers were asked to appear before the court on October 28.

October 27, 2020 03:49 pm | Updated 03:52 pm IST - Thiruvananthapuram

E.P. Jayarajan

E.P. Jayarajan

The Kerala High Court on Tuesday declined to stay the summons issued by the Thiruvananthapuram Chief Judicial Magistrate Court directing Ministers E.P Jayarajan and K.T. Jaleel to appear before it on October 28 in a criminal case registered in connection with the ruckus that took place in the State Assembly in March 2015.

When a petition challenging the magistrate court order dismissing the plea of the prosecution to withdraw the case registered against the Ministers and other CPI(M) leaders came up, the government counsel sought to stay the summons issued to the Ministers for their appearance on October 28. In fact, other CPI(M) leaders V Sivankutty, Kunjahammad, C.K. Sadasivan and K Ajith had appeared earlier before the trial court and taken bail in the case.

The Assembly had witnessed unprecedented scenes on March 13, 2015, as the then Opposition LDF members tried to prevent the then Finance Minister, K M Mani, who was facing charges in the bar bribery case, from presenting the State budget.

Besides flinging the Speaker's chair from the podium, electronic equipments such as computers, keyboard and microhpnes on the desk of the Speaker were allegedly damaged by LDF members.

Following the bedlam, a case was registered during the previous UDF government’s regime charging the six Opposition LDF MLAs with offences under the Prevention of Destruction of Public Property Act and IPC sections 447 (criminal trespass) and 427 (mischief causing damage). The case was based on a complaint filed by the Assembly Secretary.

The LDF government decided to withdraw the case after considering a petition by V Sivankutty, CPI(M) leader and former MLA who was among the accused in the case.

Dismissing the prosecution application seeking to withdraw the cases, the magistrate court had observed that the withdrawal of such cases would send a wrong message to society. It also added that the application seeking to withdraw the case was filed without good faith and on extraneous considerations.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.