scorecardresearch
Friday, Mar 29, 2024
Advertisement

Segmentation of NH over 100 km as strategy to avoid green clearances cannot be adopted: SC

Bench asked Ministry of Environment to set up an expert panel to examine if segmentation was permissible.

SC on adoption law, Supreme court, Child adoption law, guardianship laws, adoption policy, Indian express newsThe plea also urged the court to direct the Law Commission to prepare a report on 'Uniform Grounds of Adoption & Guardianship' within three months.

THE SUPREME COURT on Tuesday ruled against segmentation of national highway projects extending over 100 km into smaller packages to avoid environment impact assessment.

A bench headed by Justice L Nageswara Rao, however, said it is not an expert on the issue and asked the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change to set up an expert committee to examine if such segmentation was permissible and, if so, under what circumstance.

Setting aside a Madras High Court order, the bench also comprising Justices Hemant Gupta and Ajay Rastogi said there is no requirement for securing environmental clearances for expanding NH 45-A Villuppuram-Nagapattinam Highway (extending 179.555 km in Tamil Nadu and Puducherry) as land acquisition is not more than 40 m on existing alignments and 60 m on realignments or by-passes.

“Having held that… segmentation of a project cannot be adopted as a strategy to avoid environmental clearance impact assessment, the question that arises is whether segmentation of a national highway beyond 100km is impermissible under any circumstance. As we lack the expertise of deciding upon this issue, we are of the considered view that an expert committee should examine the permissibility of segmentation,” the bench said.

First uploaded on: 20-01-2021 at 02:45 IST
Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
close