Stephen Hendry is set to launch his improbable snooker comeback in Milton Keynes on Tuesday, nine years after retiring from the professional tour.
The 52-year-old joins a long list of major stars who could not resist giving their respective vocations one last shot after a significant period on the sidelines.
Here the PA news agency re-lives some of the best – and worst – experiences of those who succumbed to the comeback trail.
GEORGE FOREMAN
Former world heavyweight champion Foreman announced his comeback at the age of 38 in 1987, after 10 years out of the ring. After close defeats to Evander Holyfield and Tommy Morrison, Foreman remarkably claimed the world title when he outpointed Michael Moorer at the age of 45 in 1992.
BJORN BORG
Borg retired at the age of 26 after winning 11 grand slam titles but inexplicably launched a comeback bid in 1991. Palpably unfit and insistent on still playing with a wooden racket, the Swede suffered 12 straight first round defeats before finally accepting enough was enough.
MARK SPITZ
Not content with winning seven gold medals, all in world record time, at the 1972 Munich Olympics, swimming star Spitz returned at the age of 41 to try to qualify for the 1992 Games in Barcelona. Although his times roughly mirrored those from his Olympic triumphs, he finished two seconds outside the mark to make the US Trials.
LESTER PIGGOTT
Piggott announced his retirement from horse racing in 1985 after a stunning career including riding five Derby winners and 11 Ascot Gold Cups. But after five years out, including a spell in prison for tax fraud, he announced his return which culminated, at the age of 54, in his victory aboard Royal Academy in the Breeders’ Cup Mile.
TORVILL & DEAN
Having swept the board in Sarajevo with a string of perfect sixes in 1984, British ice dance pair Jayne Torvill and Christopher Dean promptly turned professional. But 10 years later they returned for one more shot at the Olympics in Lillehammer. Amid such huge anticipation, their eventual bronze medal was considered a somewhat disappointing return.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here