Business | Royal purge

Shell mulls a breakup

The oil major is looking for a less taxing energy transition

PITY BEN VAN BEURDEN. The boss of Royal Dutch Shell is an affable man steering a Scylla-and-Charybdis course between oil-loving shareholders on one extreme and carbon-hating ones on the other. His latest task is to convince investors that Shell’s strategy of doubling down on oil and gas production while bulking up on renewables is viable, even as Third Point, a hedge fund, demands it breaks itself up. And for seven years he has run a company with one foot in the Netherlands and the other in Britain—with Brexit in between.

On November 15th Shell offered shareholders some badly needed simplification. It asked them to vote next month for a proposal to ditch a dual Anglo-Dutch share structure, haul the headquarters back to Britain, and scrap the Royal Dutch name. It marks a homecoming of sorts. The original moniker dates back to the 19th century, when the company’s forebear, Marcus Samuel, dealt in sea shells along the Thames. But the reaction in parts of the Netherlands has been apoplectic. Some politicians want to impose an exit tax to dissuade Shell from leaving.

This article appeared in the Business section of the print edition under the headline "A simple solution"

The triumph of big government

From the November 18th 2021 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Business

Does Perplexity’s “answer engine” threaten Google?

Taking aim at one of the best business models of all times

How not to work on a plane

Hours without interruption and work to do. What could go wrong?


Why does BHP want Anglo American?

Its $39bn takeover offer is the latest in a string of mining mega-mergers